Death In The Air

Agatha Christie CollectionTitle: Death In The Air (aka  Death In The Clouds)
Author: Agatha Christie
Publication Year: 1935
Pages: 217
Genre: Mystery
Count for Year: 44

How I discovered

I have joined Kerrie from Mysteries in Paradise with her Agatha Christie Reading Challenge and this is part of that. Also this week is Agatha Christie Week, which coincides with a celebration of Agatha Christie’s birthday, Sept. 15, 1890, and for that, I’m reading a novel per day and posting a review here. This is my third review this week, with the first two being The Boomerang Clue and Murder in Three Acts.

The setup

…Poirot is a passenger on board a flight from Paris to Croydon. Some time before landing, one of the passengers, Madame Giselle — a moneylender — is found dead. Initially, a reaction to a wasp sting is postulated, but Poirot spies the true cause of death: a poison-tipped dart, apparently fired from a blowpipe. It becomes apparent that the victim has been murdered.

from Wikipedia

In earlier novels, The Mystery of The Blue Train and Murder on the Orient Express, Poirot has investigated murders on board a train. All that’s left to finish the trifecta is to investigate a murder on a plane and in an automobile. In this one, naturally, he investigates a murder in the air.

Again, like the last two cases that he undertook, Murder in Three Acts and Murder on The Orient Express, Poirot does so without the assistance of Capt. Arthur Hastings, who had joined him for many of his previous cases. However, he once again is joined by Chief Inspector Harold James Japp of Scotland Yard, who provides a slight comic foil to Poirot, although in my opinion, a little too late in this one.

Once again, like in Murder on the Orient Express, Poirot finds himself in a compartment where (surprisingly? hmm, I think not) occurs. The suspects are mostly English, with two Frenchmen and, of course, Poirot, himself, a Belgian. Poirot becomes a suspect when the blowpipe, believed to have been used in the murder, is found pushed down in the seat in which he was sitting– a point that is not lost on a grand jury which first names him in its verdict, but then relents after the judge tells it he can’t accept its verdict.

Poirot, of course, must clear himself, but who committed the crime? Could it be the doctor who easily identified the dart as being from South America? Or the mystery writer who seems to know a lot about poisons himself? Or a countess who owed money herself to the victim? Or the two Frenchmen, both archaeologists, just suspicious because they are French?

Again, like in the last book, Poirot reveals a little more about his method:

“What a horrible tricky sort of person you are, M. Poirot,” said Jane. “I shall never know why you are saying things.”

“That is quite simple,. I want to find out things.”

“I suppose you’ve got very clever ways of finding out things?”

“There is only one really simple way.”

“What is that?”

“Let people tell you.”

Jane laughed. “Supposed they don’t want to?”

“Everybody likes to talk about themselves.”

“I suppose they do,” admitted Jane.

“That is how many a quack makes a fortune. He encourages patients to come and sit and tell him things– how they fell out of the perambulator when they were two, and how their mother ate a pear and the juice fell on her orange dress, and how, when they were one and a half, they pulled their father’s beard; and then he tells them that now they will not suffer from their insomnia any longer, and he takes two guineas, and they go away, having enjoyed themselves, oh, so much– and perhaps they do sleep.”

“How ridiculous,” said Jane.

“No, it is not as ridiculous as you think. It is based on a fundamental need of nature– the need to talk, to reveal oneself…”

Unfortunately, as well as he describes his method, when it got to the end and the perpetrator of the crime, I didn’t quite believe it. It seemed a little too much of a leap that really wasn’t see in earlier parts of the book. Whereas in other Poirot mysteries, I could make the leap, in this one, I couldn’t connect the dots as easily as Poirot did in his summation.

For that reason, I give this one a 3 out of 5, a good read for any Poirot fan, but perhaps one to be skipped by others not so interested. However, check it out of your local library like I did and judge for yourself.

My rating system:

5- Classic, must read
4- Worth
owning a copy
3- Worth picking up at library
2- Worth skimming at the bookstore
1- Worth being a doorstop

For others reviews of the book:

If you also have reviewed this book and would like a link to be included here, please leave it in the comments or e-mail me at unfinishedperson (at) gmail (dot) com.

6 responses to “Death In The Air

  1. Pingback: What I’ve Read So Far For The Agatha Christie Reading Challenge « Unfinished Person

  2. Pingback: Murder In Mesopotamia « An unfinished person (in this unfinished universe)

  3. Pingback: The A.B.C. Murders « Unfinished Person

  4. Sorry for leaving this message in your comment section, but…

    Just A (Reading) Fool is a huge hit on

    Hi There,

    I wanted to share the news that Just A (Reading) Fool is one of the most popular blogs on If you haven’t checked out our site yet, you’ll see we’re dedicated to highlighting the best literature content on the Web every day.

    We’re currently contacting our most popular featured bloggers and asking them to claim their blogs. By doing so, you’re making it easier for thousands of new fans to quickly find your blog and read all your great posts.

    To quickly and easily claim your blog, click this link:

    Once you’ve claimed your blog, you and your fans can then vote on each of your posts to ensure they’re featured on BookBlips’ front page. And just so you know, every post that’s featured on our front page gets moved up in the rankings on all the big search engines like Google, Yahoo, etc.

    If you have questions about the blog-claiming process or feedback on, please contact us any time. We’re always here to help and we’re anxious to send more fans your way.

    Kind regards,
    Marny Bassett
    Associate Editor

  5. I just read this book. Great review and I really like your rating system. It puts meaning to numbers, great idea. 🙂

    • Wow. I think that’s about one of the quickest responses I’ve had to one of my reviews ever. Just put it up and five minutes later, a response. Thanks. I try to make the rating system mean something. I think it was mentioned during a Weekly Geeks one time. Very rarely do I finish a 1 or 2, though.

      So what did you think of the book? Or do I have to wait for your review? 🙂